Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.1d 664 - In re Brose

In re Brose’s Empirical Analysis

254 F. 664 · 1918

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
March 1993
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1993 · most notably Butner v. United States (1979), Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. Evans (1936)

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

200191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. Shepherd · Sullivan v. . Rosson · In re Banner · In re Israelson · In re Jarmulowsky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The general rule is that the mortgagee is not entitled to the rents and profits of the mortgaged premises until he takes actual possession, or until possession is taken, in his behalf, by a receiver, * * * or until, in proper form, he demands and is refused possession,’ ” the court continued: “This general rule the federal courts will follow, except in cases where it appears that the law of the state where the premises are situated applies a different rule.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lacoe v. De Long
  2. “This general rule the federal courts will follow, except in cases where it appears that the law of the state where the premises are situated applies a different rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Hotel St. James Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.