In re Weidenfeld’s Empirical Analysis
254 F. 677 · 1918
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1973
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cameron v. United States · In re Fleischer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In conclusion it must be said that the petition to revise which the alleged bankrupt has brought indicates what his policy has been throughout. He has sought to delay and to obstruct the orderly and proper administration of the bankruptcy court. The examination of his wife should take place at' the earliest practicable time and an end put to the obstructive tactics which have-been employed to hinder and delay creditors contrary to the intent of the Bankruptcy Act.” Matter of Camille Weidenfeld, 254 Fed. 677 , at page 680, — C. C. A. —, at page —, 42 Am. Bankr. R. 425, at page 429.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Weidenfeld
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.