The Rindjani’s Empirical Analysis
254 F. 913 · 1919
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 1934
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Marie · Williams v. The Welhaven · Davis v. The Burchard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provisions of article 11 of the convention, above set out, are in effect the same as those of article 10 of the treaty between the United States and the King of Prussia of May 1, 1828 ( 8 Stat. 382 ), which was the subject of consideration in The Elwine Kreplin, 9 Blatchf. 438 , Fed. Cas. No. 4,426, in which case it was held that that treaty required that the matter then in dispute a matter of wages in that case was one for the determination of the consular officer, and that the United States courts had no jurisdiction of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. The Taigen Maru“Our conclusion is that the court below had no jurisdiction over the question as to the right of the libelants to transportation from San Francisco to Rotterdam. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. The Taigen Maru
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.