Bennett v. The Mormacteal

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 7, 1958.

Decided March 13, 1958.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-03-13

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1966

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 160 F. Supp. 840 - Bennett v. the Mormacteal

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1958-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Vincent J. Longhi, New York City (Standard, Weisberg, Harolds & Malament, Louis R. Harolds, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellant.

¶2Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Joseph M. Cunningham, Walter X. Connor, Thomas F. Feeney and James H. Reidy, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

¶3Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The decree is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Abruzzo, 160 F.Supp. 840, filed April 2, 1957.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Harold Raymond Medina
Circuit Judge
Leonard Page Moore
Circuit Judge
Sterry Robinson Waterman
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Vincent J. Longhi, New York City (Standard, Weisberg, Harolds & Malament, Louis R. Harolds, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellant.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Joseph M. Cunningham, Walter X. Connor, Thomas F. Feeney and James H. Reidy, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.