Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.2d 141 - Haultain v. De Windt

Haultain v. De Windt’s Empirical Analysis

254 F.2d 141 · 1958

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2012

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

501958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Snyder · Balogh v. Crot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here testimony merely places the acts within a stated time period, the inventor has not established a date for his activities earlier than the last day of the period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.