Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.2d 338 - Swartz v. Rogers

Swartz v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

254 F.2d 338 · 1958

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Noel v. Chapman (1975), Oforji v. Ashcroft (2003)

23 federal appellate · 8 district ·

17019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harisiades v. Shaughnessy · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy · Mulcahey v. Catalanotte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]eportation would put burdens upon the marriage. It would impose upon the wife the choice of living abroad with her husband or living in this country without him. But deportation would not in any way destroy the legal union which the marriage created. The physical conditions of the marriage may change, but the marriage continues.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.