Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.2d 396 - Application of Milton E. Chandler

Application of Milton E. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1964
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on O'Reilly v. Morse · In re Barnett · In re Duncan · In re Hill · In re Lamb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As was pointed out in In re Barnett, 155 F.2d 540 , 33 C.C.P.A. Patents, 1119, it is proper to allow applicants a reasonable latitude in setting forth their inventive concepts in different phraseology, but it is the purpose of claims to point out and define what an applicant regards as his invention, and that purpose is not served if, as the result of frequent repetitions, they present to the mind a blur rather than a definition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.