United States of America v. Miguel Mercedes Elynson Matos Miguel Caro Rogelin Florian Bobby Maldanado Albert Rios Danielle Bautista Roberto Roman’s Empirical Analysis
254 F.3d 433 · 2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 21 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft (2003), United States v. Stone (2010)
4 federal appellate · 21 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Chimurenga · United States v. Martir · United States v. Orena · United States v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including the fact that the crime charged is an offense listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person, including— (A) the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, .financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and (B) whether, at the time of the cur rent offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State, or local law; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not a 'bursting bubble' that becomes devoid of all force once a defendant has met his burden of production.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Should the defendant satisfy his or her burden of production under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (f), the United States must then show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight, or by clear-and-convincing evidence that the defendant presents a danger to the community.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.