Liston v. King.com, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e have stated repeatedly (and frequently) that a complaint need not plead legal theories, which can be learned during discovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.