Baxter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably State v. Bethel (2006), State v. Zeh (1987)
3 federal appellate · 86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Godfrey v. Georgia · United States v. Henry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a defendant in a criminal case has the right, upon request, to examine a document used by a witness to refresh his recollection. [Cits.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a finding of strangulation alone would authorize a finding of aggravation under (b)(7).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Baxter v. Thomas“for the purpose of receiving ... thing[s] of monetary value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Baxter v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.