Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Ga. App. 52 - Warren v. State

254 Ga. App. 52 - Warren v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clark v. State · Carr v. State · 238 Ga. App. 206 - State v. Folk · 166 Ga. App. 817 - Castillo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who knowingly has direct physical control over a thing at a given time is in actual possession of it. A person who, though not in actual possession, knowingly has both the power and intention at a given time to exercise dominion or control over a thing is then in constructive possession of it. The law recognizes that possession may be sole or joint. If one person alone has actual or constructive possession of a thing, possession is sole. If two or more persons share [ ] actual or constructive possession of a thing, possession is joint. 4”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The [equal access] rule, ... in the automobile context, is . . . that evidence showing that a person . . . other than the . . . driver of the automobile had equal access to contraband found in the automobile may or will, depending upon the strength of the evidence, overcome the presumption that the contraband was in the exclusive possession of the . . . driver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.