Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Kan. 1 - State v. Sims

State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Carmichael v. State (1994), State v. Hawkins (2008)

29 state decisions

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Todd v. Kelly · State v. Hall · Martindale v. Tenny · State v. Williams · State v. Crozier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the evidence adduced at trial does not support the crime alleged in the charging document but supports a separate crime, the defendant cannot challenge the verdict on grounds of insufficiency of the evidence by a motion to arrest judgment. A motion to arrest judgment is a challenge to the chargng instrument or the jurisdiction of the court to try the offense alleged in the charging document, whereas an insufficiency argument is a challenge to the verdict.” 254 Kan. at 11 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A plea of guilty or a consent to trial upon a complaint, information or indictment shall constitute a waiver of defenses and objections based upon the institution of the prosecution or defects in the complaint, information or indictment other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Pursuant to K.S.A. 20-203 and K.S.A. 60-2106(b), a syllabus of the points of law decided by the Supreme Court in any case shall be stated in writing by the judge delivering the opinion of the court, which shall be confined to points of law arising from the facts in the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.