Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Miss. 641 - Rush v. State

Rush v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2012

19 state decisions

80196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lamar v. State · Bone v. State · Ware v. State · Spencer v. Marmon · Walton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a defendant takes the stand and testifies in his own behalf, he subjects himself to cross-examination. The fact that such cross-examination is vigorous is not objectionable so long as it is not abusive, and is confined to the proper scope.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.