Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Mont. 317 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · State v. Sundberg · State v. O'NEILL · State v. Crowder · State v. Valley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the reviewing judicial officer's] action cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusions of others.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “test set forth in Illinois v. Gates (1983), 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 . The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [the magistrate], including the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. [T]he duty of the reviewing court is to ensure the magistrate had a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.