State v. Dvorak’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably State v. Hausmann (2009), State v. Beyer (2000)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jacques · State v. Gibbs · In Re Adoption of Kassandra B. · Andersen v. Lyman-Richey Corp. · Workman v. Stehlik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was the district court’s final disposition of the appeal and that the district court was divested of jurisdiction over the matter upon that order. A ruling made in the absence of subject matter jurisdiction is a nullity.... Accordingly, the district court’s [second] order ... is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the merits of the appeal [from the second order]. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with direction to reinstate the conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we do not find any statute or court rule which allows for a rehearing in the district court after the district court has made its ruling.... Just as a motion for new trial does not toll the time for appeal when a district court is acting as an appellate court, neither does a motion to reconsider. As a result, the district court's exercise of subject matter jurisdiction over [the defendant's] motion for reconsideration was without statutory authority. Therefore, we hold that the order [reversing the county court's decision] was the district court's final disposition of the appeal and that the district court was divested of jurisdiction over the matter upon that order. [24]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hausmann“we do not find any statute or court rule which allows for a rehearing in the district court after the district court has made its ruling subject to § 25-1901.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.