254 N.J. Super. 133 - Hagrish v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc. (1993), May v. Anderson (2005)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 65 N.J. Super. 472 - Jannarone v. WT Co. · 136 N.J. Super. 369 - Berg Agency v. Sleepworld-Willingboro, Inc. · 74 N.J. Super. 71 - Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTON · 251 N.J. Super. 608 - Garde v. Wasson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A contracting party is bound by the apparent intention he or she outwardly manifests to the other party. It is immaterial that he or she has a different, secret intention from that outwardly manifested.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Absent unusual circumstances, the courts should enforce executory agreements to settle litigation. Jannarone v. W.T. Co., 65 N.J.Super. 472, 476-477 , 168 A.2d 72 (App.Div.1961). Plaintiffs’ failure to execute release documents did not void the original agreement, nor did it render it deficient from the outset. Execution of a release was a mere formality, not essential to formation of the contract of settlement. “So long as the basic essentials are sufficiently definite, any gap left by the parties should not frustrate their intention to be bound.” Berg Agency v. Sleepworld-Willingboro, Inc. 136 N.J.Super. 369, 377 , 346 A.2d 419 (App.Div.1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Vito
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.