Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Or. 21 - State v. Hodges

State v. Hodges’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
9
states following
February 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 1993 · most notably State v. Robertson (1982), 158 W. Va. 111 - State v. Flinn (1974)

2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

2801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · Baggett v. Bullitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A law that is too vague for reasonable adjudication is bad on two grounds. A vague statute lends itself to an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the judge and jury, and, by permitting the jury to decide what the law will be, it offends the principle, if not the rule, against ex post facto laws * * *."”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * any person who does any act which manifestly tends to cause any child to become a delinquent child."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"`It is established that a law fails to meet the requirements of the Due Process Clause if it is so vague and standardless that it leaves the public uncertain as to the conduct it prohibits or leaves judges and jurors free to decide, without any legally fixed standards, what is prohibited and what is not in each particular case. * * *'" 254 Or. at 25, 457 P.2d 491 . (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.