Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Or. 268 - State v. Fogle

State v. Fogle’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
8
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably People v. Adams (1976), State v. Spencer (1988)

28 state decisions

130196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the statute recognizes that a person may refuse to submit to the test, the legislature could hardly have contemplated that it was necessary that there be a completely knowing and understanding submission. If this were the case, the only people who could be tested would be those who were not sufficiently intoxicated to interfere with their mental processes.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Approve techniques or methods of performing chemical analyses that are satisfactory for determining alcoholic content of a person's blood.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(c) Test and certify the accuracy of equipment to be used by police officers for chemical analyses of a person's breath before regular use of such equipment and periodically thereafter at intervals of not more than 60 days, such tests and certification to be conducted by trained technicians.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.