Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Pa. Super. 367 - Reed v. High

254 Pa. Super. 367 - Reed v. High’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · May v. Anderson · People of State of New York Halvey v. Halvey · Ford v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not consistent . . . with the principle on which the leading cases rest, viz. : that, whenever a court is called upon to award the custody of a child, the guiding star is its welfare. And the court where the matter is pending must decide that grave question on its own best judgment, unfettered, but not necessarily uninfluenced, by a prior adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The court in State A [from which the children were abducted] knows as well as the court in state B [to which the children were abducted] that the child's welfare is the controlling guide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.