254 Pa. Super. 445 - Chadwin v. Krouse’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2004
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohn v. Weiss Et Ux. · Greater Valley Terminal Corp. v. Goodman · Drummond v. Drummond · Simpson v. Simpson · Mills v. Jacobs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) On petition of the plaintiff, after notice and hearing, the court in which a judgment has been entered may, before or after the issuance of a writ of execution, enter an order against any party or person “(1) enjoining the negotiation, transfer, assignment or other disposition of any security, document of title, pawn ticket, instrument, mortgage, or document representing any property interest of the defendant subject to execution; “(2) enjoining the transfer, removal, conveyance, assignment or other disposition of property of the defendant subject to execution; “(3) directing the defendant or any other party or person to take such action as the court may direct to preserve collateral security for property of the defendant levied upon or attached, or any security interest levied upon or attached; “(4) directing the disclosure to the sheriff of the whereabouts of property of the defendant; “(5) directing that property of the defendant which has been removed from the county or concealed for the purpose of avoiding execution shall be delivered to the sheriff or made available for execution; and “(6) granting such other relief as may be deemed necessary and appropriate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.