Morgavi v. Mumme’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1991
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kay v. Carter · Schaub v. O'Quin · 131 So. 2d 606 - Chandler v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. · Roberts v. Medlock · 77 So. 2d 216 - Rodriguez v. Shroder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is now ordered that the deposit in the sum of $2,100 be returned to the plaintiff herein. It is further ordered that plaintiff's demand for damages be and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered that defendant's demand for forfeiture of deposit and for damages be and the same is hereby dismissed. Costs to be paid by defendant-appellee."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morgavi v. Mumme“"In the event the purchaser fails to comply with this agreement within the time specified, the seller shall have the right to declare the deposit, ipso-facto, forfeited, without formality beyond tender of title to purchaser; or the seller may demand specific performance."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morgavi v. Mumme
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.