Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 So. 3d 38 - State v. Floyd

254 So. 3d 38 - State v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · 805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver · State v. Lindsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall apply the provisions of this Section that were in effect on the date that the defendant's instant offense was committed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “and a subsequent amendment further clarified that courts”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “consider[ing] it effectively abrogated by the 2018 enactment of R.S. 15:529.1K(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.