Baker v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Lehmberg · Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Higginbotham · St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. George · St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Watkins · Southern Traction Co. v. Hulbert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have not been referred to and have not found anything in the record indicating that the jury, in estimating the damages, were influenced by anything except the testimony, and therefore we do not think we should say that their estimate was excessive.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.