Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 Wis. 126 - Ratcliff v. Aspros

Ratcliff v. Aspros’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018

6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

6019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kollock v. Scribner · Pelikan v. Spheeris · Fergen v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the instant case the provision for renewal is too indefinite and uncertain to be enforceable and it is void. In the lease before us no procedure is outlined, no method is indicated, and no standard is set up for determining the rental and terms of a new lease. No resort to the settled rules for construction of the language of the covenant to renew can give meaning or substance to it. The courts cannot be called upon to write contracts or to supply omissions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.