Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 A2D 494 - Johnson v. United States

Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spinelli v. United States · Leary v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Benton v. United States · House v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since delay within the ten-day limitation does not, standing alone, vitiate the warrant, we hold on this record there is no showing that execution of the warrant was invalid. [Johnson v. United States, D.C.App., 255 A.2d 494, 495 (1969).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A presumption or inference may reasonably arise when “it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend.” . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.