Sulkowski v. Szewczyk’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1978
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 8 Ohio Op. 5 - Fearon v. Treanor · Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Hanfgarn v. Mark · Atkinson v. State Tax Comm'n · Wells v. Padgett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If plaintiff's contention be correct, then any action based upon a breach of promise to marry could be turned into an action for misrepresentations by merely alleging that the promise of marriage was a sham, made solely for the purpose of taking advantage of the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ab v. Cd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.