¶1Judgment in an action restraining appellants and others from using a driveway in the rear of their premises and the premises of plaintiffs for a purpose other than that permitted in the easement, and for damages unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
255 A.D. 876
Cisternino v. Berg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 28, 1938
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1938-11-28
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1938-11-28
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2011
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →