Faust v. Faust’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1965
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Webb v. Lamar · Faust v. Faust · Faust v. Faust · Lee v. State · Faust v. Ragsdale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The allowance by an appellate court of a petition for permission to file a bill of review in the trial court is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the court and should be exercised cautiously and sparingly and only in cases when it is clearly demonstrated that the interests of justice will undoubtedly be served thereby.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ryan v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.