Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ala. 632 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2000 · most notably Green v. United States (1957), State v. Pellegrino (1998)

47 state decisions

150195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. State · Mitchell v. State · DeArman v. State · Harris v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The second trial was entered upon without following the usual and correct practice of rearraignment of the defendant, explaining to him the effect of the verdict on the first trial and his right to plead acquittal of murder in the first degree. Stephens v. State, 254 Ala. 50 , 46 So.2d 820 . . . .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘The Solicitor, who prosecutes for the State, and the defendant’s attorney in open court, having agreed that the defendant was heretofore tried under the indictment herein and a verdict of conviction of Murder in the Second Degree rendered, the verdict having been set aside and a new trial granted that by operation of the law the defendant has been acquitted of Murder in the First Degree; that the defendant is now being put to trial for Murder in the Second Degree under the indictment herein, and the defendant having heretofore been duly arraigned on March 14, 1949, and having on that day plead not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity comes now also in his own proper person and by attorney. Thereupon came a jury of twelve good and lawful men, towit :***.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.