Flaherty v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2515 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Rathbun v. United States · Caton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire or oral communication, where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Probable cause exists where knowledge of facts or circumstances is imparted to the examining court sufficient to persuade an ordinarily prudent person to actually believe in good faith, as opposed to mere suspicion, that the facts asserted in the affidavit are true. . . . The judicial determination by the examining court that probable cause exists for the issuance of a search warrant is entitled to considerable deference and weight by a reviewing court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vanderkamp v. State“to mean: * * * the aural acquisition of the contents of any wire or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-2(c); 18 U.S.C.A. § 2510 (4)] In addition, in both enactments, an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.