Jacoway v. Wolfe (In Re Jacoway)’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 26 U.S.C. § 72
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 28 Cal. App. 4th 8 - Yaesu Electronics Corp. v. Tamura · In Re Witwer · Bloom v. Robinson · Macintyre Apc v. C Macintyre M
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a) As used in this section, “private retirement plan” means: (1) Private retirement plans, including, but not limited to, union retirement plans. (2) Profit-sharing plans designed and used for retirement purposes. (3)Self-employed retirement plans and individual retirement annuities or accounts provided for in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including individual retirement accounts qualified under Section 408 or 408A of that code, to the extent the amounts held in the plans, annuities, or accounts do not exceed the maximum amounts exempt from federal income taxation under that code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the primary purpose is to provide income for a debtor in retirement, the assets in the plan should be exempt under § 704.115. Otherwise, even a de minimis depletion of the plan assets would destroy the exemption, which would be contrary to the purpose of the exemption statute to preserve income for retirees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dudley v. Anderson“whether any withdrawals diminished or will diminish the assets in the [IRA] to such an extent that they are inconsistent with the majority of the assets being used for long-term retirement purposes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dudley v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.