Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 CONN 477 - State v. Joyner

State v. Joyner’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

10 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Ross (2004), State v. Crocker (2004)

10 district · 28 state decisions

270200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Franks v. Delaware · North Carolina v. Pearce · Ohio v. Roberts · Cuyler v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating issues and facts actually and necessarily determined in an earlier proceeding between the same parties or those in privity with them upon a different claim.... An issue is actually litigated if it is properly raised in the pleadings or otherwise, submitted for determination, and in fact determined _An issue is necessarily determined if, in the absence of a determination of the issue, the judgment could not have been validly rendered.... If an issue has been determined, but the judgment is not dependent upon the determination of that issue, the parties may relitigate the issue in a subsequent action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he issue concerning which relitigation is sought to be estopped must be identical to the issue decided in the prior proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.