Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.1d 241 - In re Graff

In re Graff’s Empirical Analysis

255 F. 241 · 1918

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2011

1 district ·

4019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Graff · In re Graff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there were no creditors before the court to be benefited,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.