¶1Bankruptcy <®=^467 — Review on Appeal — Findings of Fact.
¶2A finding of facts by a referee, concurred in. by tb.e District Court, will not be disturbed by tbe appellate court.
¶3<@zs>For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
¶4Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
¶5In the matter of the bankruptcy of the Model Incubator Company. From an order of the District Court, the Queen City Foundry Company, Incorporated, appeals.
¶6Affirmed.
¶7Gibbons & Pottle, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Frank Gibbons, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.
¶8Paul Sheehan, of Buffalo, N. Y., for appellee.
¶9Before WARD, ROGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.
¶11This record shows that on a vital question of fact, viz. whether assuming fraudulent representation on the bankrupt’s part the petitioner was in the least misled or influenced thereby, both the referee and the District Court found the fact to be against petitioner’s contention. As we remarked in a somewhat similar case, the trial court “had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, and his finding upon the facts should not be disturbed.” In re K. Marks & Co., 218 Fed 455, 134 C. C. A. 255.
¶12In this instance, we are in entire accord with the finding below, and-therefore affirm the order appealed from, with costs.