Smith v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1919.)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1919-02-03

1 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1919-02-03

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Fourth Division of the Territory of Alaska.

¶2R. F. Roth, U. S. ,Atty., and Harry E. Pratt, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Annette Abbott Adams, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Motion for dismissal of writ of error for noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C. C. A. ix) granted, and writ of error dismissed.