Shotkin v. Popenhager’s Empirical Analysis
255 F.2d 100 · 1958
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1964
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co. · Marten v. Hess · Deena Products Co. v. United Brick & Clay Workers · Waddell v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.