Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

255 F.2d 104

Docket No. 13370.

Foundoulis v. Lehmann

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-05-12

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-05-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1972

5 federal appellate ·

20195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Philip Bartell, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Sumner Canary, U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio (Russell E. Ake, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Foundoulis brought an action for review of an order of deportation outstanding against him and appeals from the district court's denial of the relief requested. A review of the record convinces us that the district court's disposition of this case was correct.

¶2

At the administrative hearing the evidence was uncontroverted that Foundoulis, a Greek seaman, had failed to comply with the conditions of the Crewman's Landing Permit which had been issued to him. There was moreover no showing that he was prejudiced by a continuance of not more than three days to meet the lodged charge, nor denied procedural due process in any other respect. Consideration of the eligibility of Foundoulis for quota preference under the provisions of 8 U.S.C.A. § 1153, was beyond the scope of the deportation hearing.

¶3

The order of the district court is affirmed.

/255/f2d/104 · .json · Public domain