Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.2d 176 - Mabel K. Harris v. Dr. R. M. Brian

Mabel K. Harris v. Dr. R. M. Brian’s Empirical Analysis

255 F.2d 176 · 1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1974
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1974

8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

40195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Purchase v. Seelye · Paris v. Crittenden · Keown v. Young · McIntosh v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.