Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

255 F.2d 181

Docket No. 13888.

Randall v. Bockhorst

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 7, 1958. Decided April 24, 1958.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-04-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1958

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Lattimore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-04-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; David A. Pine, Judge.

See also 98 U.S.App.D.C. 77, 232 F.2d 334.

Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Nathan Rubey, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. George R. Jacobi, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case turns on interpretation of a certain separation agreement. We agree with the District Court that the language of this agreement may be regarded as calling for the continuance of periodic payments to the wife after the husband's death.

¶2

Affirmed.

/255/f2d/181 · .json · Public domain