Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.2d 247 - Conrad v. United States

Conrad v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

255 F.2d 247 · 1958

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 1972
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1972

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

50195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Relies on Berger v. United States · Bryan v. United States · Warszower v. United States · Alcorta v. Texas · United States v. Norris

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.