Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.2d 378 - Carlton Amos Crider, Bankrupt v. W. Bascom Jordan, Trustee

Carlton Amos Crider, Bankrupt v. W. Bascom Jordan, Trustee’s Empirical Analysis

255 F.2d 378 · 1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2011

4 federal appellate ·

501958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Underhill · Roberts v. W. P. Ford & Son, Inc. · In the Matter of Gentile · Bullock v. Spencer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““His defense in this discharge proceeding is that his failure to keep records did not relate to his business transactions, but merely to his personal expenses and gambling losses, which are not within the terms of the statute. The court below considered this excuse but rejected it. In our opinion this conclusion was correct, since the explanation is clearly insufficient to meet the requirements of Section 14, sub. c of the statute, that where reasonable grounds for refusing a discharge are shown by an objector, the burden of disproving the charge rests upon the bankrupt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he bankrupt has ... (2) destroyed, mutilated, falsified, concealed, or failed to keep or preserve books of account or records from which his financial condition and business transactions might be ascertained, unless the court deems such acts or failure to have been justified under all the circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.