Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.2d 9 - Miranda v. United States

Miranda v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

255 F.2d 9 · 1958

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 9 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably Examining Bd. of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores De Otero (1976), Shotwell Manufacturing Company v. United States (1963)

46 federal appellate · 9 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 15 states

26019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3771 · 28 U.S.C. § 119 · 28 U.S.C. § 132 · 28 U.S.C. § 133 · 28 U.S.C. § 451 · 48 U.S.C. § 645 · 48 U.S.C. § 863 · 48 U.S.C. § 864

Relies on Agnew v. United States · Dalehite v. United States · Trop v. Dulles · United States v. Gale · Humphries v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The object is to give each juror an opportunity, before the verdict is recorded, to declare in open court his assent to the verdict which the foreman has returned and thus to enable the court and the parties to ascertain with certainty that a unanimous verdict has in fact been reached and that no juror has been coerced or induced to agree to a verdict to which he has not fully assented.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a verdict is returned and before it is recorded the jury shall be polled at the request of any party or upon the court’s own motion. If upon the poll there is not unanimous concurrence, the jury may be directed to retire for further deliberations or may be discharged.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he right to poll the jury is the right to require each juror individually to state publicly his assent to or dissent from the returned verdict which has been announced in open court in his presence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.