Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F.3d 19 - Interstate Litho Corp. v. Brown

Interstate Litho Corp. v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

255 F.3d 19 · 2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Doyle Hp v. Hasbro Inc · Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc. · TCP Industries, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc. · Andrade v. Jamestown Housing Authority · Locricchio v. Legal Services Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge, who possesses particular insight into the main issues in a case, does not have an obligation to instruct a jury on every nuance of a party's claim or defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he wording of instructions is within the trial judge's discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shall be freely given when justice so requires,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.