Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

255 F. App'x 527

Bell v. Erwin

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-11-06

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Decided 2007-11-06

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 29, 2007, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

/255/fappx/527 · .json · Public domain