Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

255 F. App'x 706

Newman v. Haynes

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2007

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-11-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2675

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2007-11-27

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Simon Newman appeals the district court order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Newman’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. ’Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s, reasoning that Newman did not exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2675(a) (2000). See Newman v. Haynes, No. 5:06-cv-00091-FPS, 2007 WL 1960610 (N.D.W.Va. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument *707 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/255/fappx/706 · .json · Public domain