Pritchard v. Dow Agro Sciences’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 136 (Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act of 1972)
Relies on Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Co. · Koplove v. Ford Motor Co. · Hewlett 87-1384 v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to withdraw admissions is most likely to be granted where (1) upholding the admissions would be to practically eliminate any presentation of the merits, and (2) the admissions resulted from brief delays or inadvertent technical deficiencies that were promptly corrected without undue burden from the requesting party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he court may permit withdrawal or amendment if it would promote the presentation of the merits of the action and if the court is not persuaded that it would prejudice the requesting party in maintaining or defending the action on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.