Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 F. Supp. 3d 212 - Mitchell v. Samuels

255 F. Supp. 3d 212 - Mitchell v. Samuels’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al. · Firestone v. K Firestone · Blair-Bey v. Quick · Lepkowski v. United States Department of Treasury · Murray v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The granting of a Rule 60(b) motion is discretionary, and need not be granted 'unless the district court finds that there is an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.