Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ga. 284 - Marsh v. Way

Marsh v. Way’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2017

14 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 158 Ga. App. 130 - Talley v. City Tank Corp. · Hagan v. Robert & Co. Associates · Newport Timber Corp. v. Floyd · 133 Ga. App. 602 - Thomas v. Home Credit Co. · 170 Ga. App. 300 - Marsh v. Way

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an appellate court vacates a [lower] court’s judgment and remands for findings of fact and conclusions of law on a specific issue, this does not permit the [lower] court to reopen the case for other purposes. Instead, the scope of the [lower] court’s authority to act on remand is limited to the specific purpose of making the applicable findings and conclusions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he date on which the trial court is re-invested with jurisdiction of a case upon remand from the appellate court is the date of the actual filing of the remittitur in the trial court[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the redundant and perfunctory step of refiling the motion would place form over substance [.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.