¶1dissenting.
¶2The landowner first purchased an interest in the property in 1978. At that time the property was zoned RM-75 but not for mobile home parks. The majority hold that the county’s failure in 1973 to give notice to the landowner’s predecessor in title invalidates the 1973 amendment. I would hold that a purchaser of land lacks standing to complain that his predecessor in title was not afforded notice of a zoning change. I therefore dissent.