Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2011
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 187 Cal. App. 2d 68 - People v. Horn · 121 Ga. App. 41 - Gee v. State · 133 Ga. App. 723 - Moreland v. State · 105 Ga. App. 20 - Drake v. Thyer Manufacturing Corp. · 273 Cal. App. 2d 279 - People v. Clay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that in order to support a conviction ... for maintaining a residence or other structure or place used for keeping controlled substances, the evidence must show that one of the purposes for maintaining the structure was the keeping of the controlled substance; thus, the mere possession of limited quantities of a controlled substance within the residence of structure is insufficient to support a conviction[ ]. [We further] hold that in order to support a conviction under this statute for maintaining a residence or other structure or place used for selling controlled substances, the evidence must be sufficient to support a finding of more than a single, isolated instance of the proscribed activity ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Chua v. State · State v. Mitchell“a single occasion cannot be sufficient to show a crime of a continuing nature.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[K]nowingly to keep or maintain any store, shop, warehouse, dwelling, building, vehicle, boat, aircraft, or other structure or place which is resorted to by persons using controlled substances. . . for the purposes of using these substances or which is used for keeping or delivering them. . . . [7]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Priest v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.